Home |  site-map |  indonesia |  indonesian-single-source-articles |  asteroid-user-registration |

Roy Morgan OZ Panel Login  |  Mail Diary Panel Login |   careers |  contact-us |  state-of-the-nation-webcast |

Roy Morgan Research OnlineStore Video Link International Tandberg Starter Pack Promotion The Latest Roy Morgan Poll
 Search:   
 COMPANY  ONLINE STORE  PRODUCTS  SERVICES  INDUSTRIES  MORGAN POLL  PAPERS  PRESS RELEASES  CONSUMER CONFIDENCE  READERSHIP  UNEMPLOYMENT  THE REACTOR  CAREERS 
   NEWS : Morgan Poll :
Printer Friendly Version  Printer Friendly Version    E-mail It  E-mail It  
  
 
L-NP Would Win a Close Federal Election

Finding No. 3662 - August 17, 2003

In the first poll taken after the bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Jakarta and the announcement that Bali bomber Amrozi was to receive the death penalty for his terrorist crime, primary support for the L-NP rose 0.5% to 44%, while support for the ALP was also up 0.5% to 39%. On a two-party preferred basis, L-NP support was up 0.5% to 50.5% while ALP support was down 0.5% to 49.5%. If a Federal Election had been held in early August, the L-NP would have won a close election, the latest Morgan Poll finds.

Among the minor parties, support for the Greens was 7% (down 2%), Australian Democrats 4% (up 1.5%), One Nation 1% (unchanged) and Other Parties and Independent Candidates 5% (down 0.5%).

In the week prior to the polling period:

  • At the Marriott Hotel in Jakarta, a suicide bomber caused the death of up to 10 people and injuries to another 150 people. The Australian Government warned of possible further terrorist attacks in Jakarta, to coincide with the trials of the accused Bali bombers, and urged Australians to defer all non-essential travel to the Indonesian capital.

  • An Indonesian Court found "the smiling assassin" Amrozi guilty of helping to carry out last year’s Bali nightclub attacks. Amrozi was sentenced to death.

Gary Morgan says:

"During times of crisis, support for the Party in office usually increases. If a Federal election had been held in early August the L-NP would have won, even though the State ALP is ahead in all States."

Special Roy Morgan Qualitative Research conducted on August 9/10, in which respondents gave reasons for their voting intention, shows that the people of Australia are looking for stability and security in a time of international instability. People feel secure with the current Federal Government. It's not just about defence issues; it's also a general sense of security that comes with a relatively stable economy. The average person feels safe knowing that interest rates are low and the economy is relatively stable so they can plan for their own future.

The Howard Government provides electors with a ‘known quantity'. Whether or not electors agree with everything the Federal Government does, the attraction of the known over the unknown is powerful - 'better the devil you know'. The ALP is an unknown quantity for most and in a time of international instability, electors don't want to feel insecure.

That's not to say that everyone feels this way. A large number of electors feel that the Howard Government has gone too far - what about social justice, what about education, what about health? they say. What about the value of looking after those who can't look after themselves? For these people, there is a sense that the Howard Government is dismantling the welfare state and creating a user-pays society — this is something that goes against the Australian ideal of a 'fair go'.

The question is, on Election Day will the desire for a fair go for all outweigh the desire to feel secure? In this time of international insecurity, it isn't likely. However with still about a year until the next Federal Election, there is always the chance that the world's and Australia's focus could change.

Some of the comments made by electors as to their voting intention are presented below.

L-NP Supporters

L-NP supporters were typically satisfied with the job being done by the current Federal Government and felt no need to change. Comments included:

"Like their package of policies - better balanced. Labor doesn't have its act together."

"I think they're leading the country in the right way."

"Good financial management by the Government."

"I agree with their current policies."

"The only ones at the moment who can run the country - policies on finance, security and external affairs are in the country's best interest."

"Stay with the current Government - no need to change."

"Being a home owner, interest rates have been good."

"Because of the way they have handled terrorism - the Opposition is too weak."

"It seems the most appropriate now. They have the best policy for this time and age in Australia."

"Good job - defence spending; keep the economy stable and interest rates low."

Prime Minister John Howard received praise from many L-NP supporters, who respected his actions in recent international events and felt that they could trust him to deliver what he promised.

"I like Mr Howard, I think he's pretty honest."

"I like John Howard. He has charisma. I agree with the things he does."

"Howard is doing quite well at the moment."

"I think Mr Howard is a really good PM. He's done a lot of good for us."

"Like the leadership and have great confidence in Mr Howard under difficult situations."

"John Howard is doing a good job - and I have always been a Labor Party voter!"

A number of L-NP supporters felt that the Coalition could be trusted more than other parties.

"I think they have kept more promises than the other parties."

"I don't trust the others."

"They stick to what they promise, the results are good."

"Marginally more honest than the others."

"I don't trust the ALP."

While other L-NP supporters believed that the Opposition didn't have it's act together and so didn't deserve to govern Australia. For some, there was a sense of disappointment in this realisation.

"Because the other main party, although I'm sympathetic to their basic principles, don't appear to apply or represent those principles at present."

"No confidence in Simon Crean. Labor policies are not realistic."

"Labor is not ready to run the country."

"The other mob has lost the plot."

"I don't like the influence of the Unions on the Labor Party."

"I don’t like the Opposition."

"No confidence in Labor Party. No policies."

"Liberal Party seems to get things done. The Labor Party is all talk and no action."

"The Labor Party no longer represents the working class and so I won't vote for them any more."

For some L-NP supporters, the stability offered by continuing with the present Government was appealing.

"For the stability of the country. At the moment the world is in turmoil. Better to have stability than a change of Government."

"We need stability."

"Stability mainly - the other parties' policies are too idealistic."

 

ALP Supporters

ALP supporters typically preferred the Labor Party's social policies, with Health and Medicare, Education, and Refugees and Immigration policies the primary focus.

"I look to the party which has the best social policies."

"I used to be Liberal. The way it is for education, health and the poor made me change my mind."

"Concerned about Medicare, public health and public education. Howard's policies currently seem to threaten these areas."

"I agree more with their policies than those of the current Government."

"Medicare - I want to protect it."

"Their policies suit me."

"Medicare issues in this country are critical - ALP supports this better."

"They have better education and health policies."

"Policies on health, education and the environment are more suited to my view."

"Social justice issues - income distribution - taxing policies. Under Howard, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer."

The belief that the ALP cares more for community, for workers and for the average member of society was a recurring theme for ALP supporters, with many saying that it was their agreement with this philosophy that meant the Labor Party always received their support.

"I believe they support the people."

"I'm more aligned with their philosophy. I always vote for them."

"Because they are more for the people, the community."

"They care about people."

"I'm a party supporter. I agree with their philosophy."

"Give the workers a chance."

"Labor look after people. The others are more elite."

"I have a philosophical preference for the Labor Party. They do more for the community and the average, everyday person."

"Because they care more for the community, I'd like to think. They have a sense of the future."

A few ALP supporters had faith in the future of the Labor Party despite being unsure of its current state.

"There are no other alternatives and I believe that one day they will find their way back home."

"I'm not certain about Mr Crean but I'm prepared to give him a go."

Other ALP supporters were not happy with the current Federal Government and Prime Minister John Howard.

"Not happy with John Howard even though I always supported them and generally favour their overall policies."

"Disagree with many of the Prime Minister's policies."

"Disheartened with the Liberal Party."

"Unhappy with the direction of the current Government's policies, especially immigration, United Nations and a number of social areas - a ‘user-pays' society."

"Howard is dismantling the welfare state and making other bad policy decisions."

Just as some L-NP supporters felt that the Coalition was more trustworthy than the ALP, so too did some ALP supporters feel that the ALP was more trustworthy than the Coalition. A number of ALP supporters cited the Liberal Party's dishonesty as the reason they supported the Labor Party.

"Believe the ALP is somewhat more honest than Mr Howard, who has broken his word."

"I don't like John Howard. He's twisted around. He promised, he's reneged on his promises."

"I don't like the Liberal Party. They have a problem with the truth and seem to think the Australian public are a bunch of idiots."

As a sad indictment on the world of politics, one ALP supporter was resigned to dishonesty but said, "I'll stick with the one that doesn't lie as much."

Other ALP supporters simply felt the need for a change of Government.

"Change and hopefully more social equity."

"Liberals need to be replaced."

"We need a change."

"A change would be good for the country.."

 

Preferences of supporters of One Nation (L-NP — 53.5% cf ALP — 46.5%) and Other Parties and Independent Candidates (ALP — 51.5% cf L-NP — 48.5%) favoured the Government. Preferences of supporters of the Greens (ALP — 78% cf L-NP — 22%), Australian Democrats (ALP — 75% cf L-NP — 25%) favoured the Opposition.

This latest Morgan Poll on Federal Voting Intention was conducted face-to-face on the weekend of August 9/10, 2003, with an Australia-wide cross-section of 1,062 electors. Electors were asked: "If a Federal election for the House of Representatives were being held today — which party would receive your first preference?" Of all electors surveyed, 4.5% (unchanged) did not name a party.

For further information:

Gary Morgan:    Office: (03) 9224 5213   Mobile: 0411 129 094   Home: (03) 9419 3242

FEDERAL VOTING INTENTION SUMMARY - HOUSE OF REPS (%)

PRIMARY VOTE L-NP ALP Aust.
Dem.
The
Greens
One
Nation
Ind./
Others
Election March 2, 1996 47.3 (8.6) 38.8 6.8 1.7 N/A 5.4
Election October 3, 19981 39.5 (5.3) 40.1 5.1 2.1 8.5 4.7
Election November 10, 2001 43 (5.6) 37.8 5.4 4.4 4.3 5.1
MORGAN POLL 2003  
June 7/8 & June 14/15 45 (3) 37.5 3.5 8.5 1 4.5
June 21/22 & June 28/29 45.5 (2) 37 2.5 10 0.5 4.5
July 5/6 & July 12/13 44.5 (3.5) 37.5 2.5 9.5 1 5
July 19/20 & July 26/27 43.5 (3) 38.5 2.5 9 1 5.5
August 9/10 44 (3.5) 39 4 7 1 5
Note: National Party results are in brackets
# Sample Sizes under 50 should be treated with caution

1 October 3, 1998 Federal election results have been updated to include results from the electorate of Newcastle supplementary election. The L-NP did not have a candidate contesting the electorate of Newcastle.


 

TWO-PARTY PREFERRED VOTE
  L-NP ALP
Election March 2, 1996 53.6 46.4
Election October 3, 19981 49 51
Election November 10, 2001 51 49
MORGAN POLL 2003  
June 7/8 & June 14/15 51 49
June 21/22 & June 28/29 51 49
July 5/6 & July 12/13 50.5 49.5
July 19/20 & July 26/27 50 50
August 9/10 50.5 49.5
1 For the October 3, 1998 Federal election the L-NP didn't contest the Newcastle supplementary election. For Newcastle the L-NP "two-Party" estimate includes those who didn't vote ALP or give their preference to the ALP. If the Newcastle two-Party preferred vote for the October 3, 1998 election is excluded the Australia-wide "two-Party" preferred vote is L-NP - 49.0% cf ALP - 51.0%

 

TWO-PARTY PREFERENCES OF MINOR PARTIES

June 21/22
&  June 28/29

July 5/6
&  July 12/13

July 19/20
&  July 26/27

August 9/10 

MORGAN POLL L-NP ALP L-NP ALP L-NP ALP L-NP ALP
Australian Democrats 38.5 61.5  39.5 60.5 28 72 25 75
The Greens 19 81  19  81 21.5 78.5 22 78
One Nation 49 51  29.5  70.5 70.5 29.5 53.5 46.5
Independent/Other 40.5 59.5  42  58

44

56

51.5

48.5

Sample: 1,062 electors interviewed face-to-face on August 9/10, 2003.

4.5% (unchanged) did not name a party.

View Federal Voting Intention Trend


Finding No. 3662 is taken from Computer Report No. 1898

The Morgan Poll is conducted by the
ONLY Australian or New Zealand member of the Gallup International Association.
No other public opinion poll taken in Australia or New Zealand
has this qualification.


© 2010 Roy Morgan Research. All Rights Reserved
privacy-statement   



    « Powered by Straker SHADO CMS »