Home |  site-map |  indonesia |  indonesian-single-source-articles |  asteroid-user-registration |

Roy Morgan OZ Panel Login  |  Mail Diary Panel Login |   careers |  contact-us |

Roy Morgan Research OnlineStore The Latest Roy Morgan Poll

 Search:  

 COMPANY   ONLINE STORE   PRODUCTS   SERVICES   INDUSTRIES   MORGAN POLL   PAPERS   PRESS RELEASES   CONSUMER CONFIDENCE   READERSHIP   UNEMPLOYMENT   THE REACTOR 
   NEWS : Morgan Poll :
Printer Friendly Version  Printer Friendly Version    E-mail It  E-mail It  
  
 
L-NP Would Win Election, ALP Support Stable Under Beazley

Finding No. 3836 - February 19, 2005

In early February, primary support for the L-NP Coalition was unchanged at 45%, 1.4% below the result obtained by the L-NP at the recent Federal election. Support for the ALP dropped by 0.5% to 37.5% - 0.1% below the ALP result at the Federal election.

If preferences of minor parties were allocated as they were at the 2004 Federal election (ALP — 60.5%, L-NP — 39.5%) the two-party preferred vote would be L-NP — 52%, ALP — 48%. Had an election been held in early February, the Coalition would have been returned with a slightly decreased majority, the latest Morgan Poll finds.

Among the minor parties, support for the Greens was 9% (up 1%), Australian Democrats 2% (unchanged), Family First 2% (unchanged), One Nation 1% (down 0.5%) and Other Parties and Independent Candidates 3.5% (unchanged).

Gary Morgan says:

“Despite speculation of rising interest rates, Coalition support is still strong.

“Special Roy Morgan Qualitative Research shows many L-NP supporters are happy with the way the Federal Government has handled the economy so far, and have confidence in how they will deal with the impending interest rates issue.

During the period:

•  The Reserve Bank of Australia warned there was a greater likelihood of interest rates rising soon, as inflation rises.

•  The Federal Government was widely criticised when it was revealed that a mentally ill Australian resident was detained in South Australia ’s Baxter Detention Centre for 10 months. A private inquiry has been launched.

•  Pro-life National Party Senator Ron Boswell re-ignited the abortion debate amongst Federal MPs. Although Prime Minister John Howard said the Government has no intention of changing existing laws, Mr Howard said he would not prevent a private member’s bill being debated in Parliament.

•  The latest report from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) said Australia needs to improve its economic growth to deal with problems posed by an ageing population, including cutting personal income tax rates to provide more incentives for work and savings.

Special Roy Morgan Qualitative Research in which respondents gave their reason for voting was conducted on February 12/13, 2005.

Many L-NP supporters mentioned Australia ’s robust economy as their reason for voting for the current Government. Comments included: “Because of potential tax cuts — the Opposition isn’t really an opposition” , “Liberal policies balance social security and economics”, “Mainly interest rates — Labor doesn’t know how to handle interest rates and the economy in general” , “Encourage economic development” and “They look after the economy better than anyone else — I think John Howard has done a fantastic job.”

Some L-NP supporters also mentioned the Government’s conservatism, saying: “John Howard has got good Christian morals and that’s the way to go”, “I have the same conservative leanings” and “I prefer a more conservative approach”.

Many ALP supporters were critical of John Howard and the L-NP Government’s policies, saying “I don’t like John Howard, he doesn’t listen to people and he’s so much like Bush” , “Public services are being down graded by the current Government, and I’m also concerned with forms of corruption” , “I very much object to the social agenda of this Government, particularly in regard to refugees, education and foreign policy” and “ I’m grossly dissatisfied with the current Government” .

ALP supporters were typically satisfied with the Labor Party and its policies, saying: “The Labor party has a better emphasis on education”, “Kim Beazley is the only person who could do a better job than John Howard”, “The ALP is more socially progressive” and “Because of high taxes I don’t trust the Liberals” .

On the question of who the electorate thinks will win the next Federal election, the L-NP is leading the ALP by a huge 45.5%. Now 67% (unchanged since late January) of electors think the L-NP will win the Federal election while 21.5% (unchanged) think the ALP will win (11.5% can’t say).

This latest Morgan Poll on Federal Voting Intention was conducted face-to-face on the weekends of February 5/6 & 12/13, 2005, with an Australia-wide cross-section of 2,102 electors. Electors were asked: “If a Federal election for the House of Representatives were being held today - which party would receive your first preference?” Of all electors surveyed, a low 3.5% (up 0.5%) did not name a party.

 

For further information:

Gary Morgan:

Office (03) 9224 5213

Mobile 0411 129 094

Home (03) 9419 3242

Michele Levine:

Office (03) 9224 5215

Mobile 0411 129 093

Home (03) 9817 3066

THINK WILL WIN

Respondents were asked: "Regardless of who you'd like to win, who to you THINK will win the next Federal election - the Liberal-National Coalition ot the Labor Party?"

Think Will Win
           L-NP
           ALP
     Can't Say
  % % %
October 30/31 & November 6/7, 2004 56 28 16
November 13/14 & 20/21, 2004 55.5 30 14.5
November 27/28 & December 4/5, 2004 63.5 23 13.5
December 11/12 & 18/19, 2004 64 23.5 12.5
January 8/9 & 15/16, 2005 69.5 19.5 11
January 22/23 & 29/30, 2005 67 21.5 11.5
February 5/6 & 12/13, 2005 67 21.5 11.5

 

FEDERAL VOTING INTENTION SUMMARY - HOUSE OF REPS (%)

PRIMARY VOTE L-NP ALP Aust.
Dem. #
The
Greens

Family

First#

One
Nation #
Ind./
Others
Election March 2, 1996 47.3 (8.6) 38.8 6.8 1.7 * N/A 5.4
Election October 3, 1998 1 39.5 (5.3) 40.1 5.1 2.1 * 8.5 4.7
Election November 10, 2001 43 (5.6) 37.8 5.4 4.4 * 4.3 5.1
Election October 9, 2004 46.4 (5.9) 37.6 1.2 7.2 2 1.2 4.4
MORGAN POLL
Oct 30/31 & Nov 6/7, 2004 44.5 (2.5) 39.5 2 8.5 2 1 2.5
Nov 13/14 & 20/21, 2004 44 (3) 39 2 8.5 1.5 1 4
Nov 27/28 & Dec 4/5, 2004 46.5 (2.5) 36 1.5 9 2.5 1 3.5
Dec 11/12 & 18/19, 2004 45.5 (3) 36.5 1.5 9.5 2 1.5 3.5
Jan 8/9 & 15/16, 2005 47 (3.5) 37 1.5 7.5 2 1 4
Jan 22/23 & 29/30, 2005 45 (2.5) 38 2 8 2 1.5 3.5
Feb 5/6 & 12/13, 2005 45 (2.5) 37.5 2 9 2 1 3.5

Note: National Party results are in brackets
# Sample Sizes under 50 should be treated with caution

*The Family First Party were included as an option on Federal Voting Intention from October 30, 2004

1 October 3, 1998 Federal election results have been updated to include results from the electorate of Newcastle supplementary election. The L-NP did not have a candidate contesting the electorate of Newcastle.

TWO-PARTY PREFERRED VOTE (%)

         
 

L-NP

ALP

   
         

Election March 2, 1996

53.6

46.4

   

Election October 3, 1998

49

51

   
Election November 10, 2001 51 49    
Election October 9, 2004 52.7 47.3    
         

MORGAN POLL

Preferences distributed

by how electors

say they will vote

Preferences distributed

by how electors voted

at the 2004 election

October 30/31 & November 6/7, 2004 50.5 49.5 50.5 49.5
November 13/14 & 20/21, 2004 50 50 50.5 49.5
November 27/28 & December 4/5, 2004 52.5 47.5 53 47
December 11/12 & 18/19, 2004 51 49 52.5 47.5
January 8/9 & 15/16, 2005 53.5 46.5 53 47
January 22/23 & 29/30, 2005 51.5 48.5 51.5 48.5
Feb 5/6 & 12/13, 2005 51.5 48.5 52 48

 

TWO-PARTY PREFERENCES OF MINOR PARTIES (%)

 

Dec 11/12 & 18/19

Jan 8/9 & 15/16 Jan 22/23 & 29/30 Feb 5/6 & 12/13
MORGAN POLL

L-NP

ALP

L-NP
ALP
L-NP
ALP
L-NP
ALP
Australian Democrats # 16 84 44.5 55.5 41.5 58.5 32 68

The Greens

11.5 88.5 20 80 19 81 22.5 77.5
Family First#
67.5 32.5 69.5 30.5 65 35 63 37
One Nation #
51.5 48.5 74 26 42.5 57.5 54 46

Independent/Other

36.5 63.5 51 49 40.5 59.5 57 43

 

Morgan Poll sampling tolerance:

The margin of error to be allowed for in any estimate depends mainly on the number of interviews on which it is based. The following table gives indications of the likely range within which estimates would be 95% likely to fall, expressed as the number of percentage points above or below the actual estimate. The figures are approximate and for general guidance only, and assume a simple random sample. Allowance for design effects (such as stratification and weighting) should be made as appropriate.

Sample size

Percentage estimate

 

25-75%

10% or 90%

5% or 95%

1000

 ± 3

 ± 2

 ± 1½

# Sample Sizes under 50 should be treated with caution
Sample: 2,152 electors interviewed face-to-face on January 22/23 & 29/30, 2005

3% (up 0.5%) did not name a party.

View Federal Voting Intention Trend


Finding No. 3836 is taken from Computer Report No. 2019


© 2007 Roy Morgan Research. All Rights Reserved
privacy-statement   



    « Powered by Straker SHADO CMS »