Home |  site-map |  indonesia |  indonesian-single-source-articles |  asteroid-user-registration |

Mail Diary Panel Login |   careers |  contact-us |

Roy Morgan Research OnlineStore The Latest Roy Morgan Poll

 Search:   

CompanyOnline StoreProductsServicesIndustriesNewsMorgan PollPapersConsumer ConfidenceReadership and Other
   NEWS : Morgan Poll :
Printer Friendly Version  Printer Friendly Version    E-mail It  E-mail It  
  
 
ALP Primary Support Up 4% To 43%, L-NP Down 3.5% To 40.5%, ALP Would Win

Finding No. 3852 - April 16, 2005

In early April, after the Reserve Bank announced a hold on interest rates and before Prime Minister John Howard announced changes to the Medicare system, primary support for the ALP rose 4% to 43%, 5.4% above the result obtained by the ALP at the October 2004 Federal election. Support for the L-NP fell 3.5%, now at 40.5%. This is 5.9% below the L-NP result at the Federal election.

If preferences of minor parties were allocated as they were at the 2004 Federal election (ALP — 60.5%, L-NP — 39.5%) the two-party preferred vote would be ALP — 53%, L-NP — 47%. Had an election been held in early April, the ALP would have won, the latest Morgan Poll finds.

Among the minor parties, support for the Greens was 8% (unchanged), Australian Democrats 1.5% (unchanged), Family First 2% (unchanged), One Nation 1.5% (up 0.5%) and Other Parties and Independent Candidates 3.5% (down 1%).

Gary Morgan says:

“The latest results must be of concern to the L-NP, and Mr Howard in particular.

“Even before the latest back flip - changing the Medicare ‘Safety Net’ - was announced, there was concern in the electorate about broken promises and the Government not delivering on promises.

“There is also a continued undercurrent of ‘dishonesty’ and ‘lies’ emerging throughout the qualitative research, especially associated with John Howard.

“However, the real concern for the L-NP must be interest rates. Support for the L-NP is driven predominantly by their perceived strength as better economic managers and their ability to keep interest rates low.

“The electorate remains concerned about interest rates, despite the Reserve Bank deciding to hold interest rates in April.

“Continued discussion about the sale of WMC Resources to BHP Billiton and the undercurrent of concerns over overseas control and uranium issues is just another thing for the Howard L-NP Government to deal with at this time.”

During the period:

•  Treasurer Peter Costello continued to put pressure on the State Governments over using GST Tax Revenue to cut State-based taxes.

•  The Reserve Bank of Australia decided to hold interest rates at 5.50%, after last month’s rise of 0.25%.

•  ALP Leader Kim Beazley committed a future Labor Government to economic reform. Mr Beazley said that Australia needs more investment in education and training, and in national infrastructure.

•  Australia committed medical teams to Indonesia to help with relief efforts in the wake of the earthquake in Indonesia .

•  Nine Australian Defence Force personnel were killed when a Sea King helicopter crashed on the Indonesian island of Nias . Prime Minister John Howard defended the Navy’s use of these 30 year old aircrafts.

•  Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi, signed an agreement with Mr Howard to begin negotiations on a bilateral free trade agreement between Australia and Malaysia . Mr Abdullah Badawi was in Australia for a three day visit - the first official visit by a Malaysian Prime Minister in twenty years.

Special Roy Morgan Qualitative Research in which respondents gave their reason for voting was conducted on April 9/10, 2005.

Many L-NP supporters mentioned the economy as their reason for voting for the current Government. Comments included: “[The Liberal Party have] done a good job of the economy. The country is going well”, “We have quality of life”, “Historically good managers of economy”, “The Liberal Party has put Australia on a strong economic footing”, “The economy — more jobs”, “Labor are not good economically” and “I don’t think the Labor Party can control money, they would get us into the red”.

L-NP supporters were generally satisfied with Mr Howard and the L-NP, saying: “Howard is honest and I trust him”, “They have kept the country afloat and I like John Howard, he is a good leader”, “I like John Howard. He’s a great, honest PM. Trustworthy” and “The country is pretty good with the Liberal Party”.

Some L-NP supporters were critical of Mr Beazley’s leadership and Labor Party policies, with comments such as: “I dislike the leader of ALP”, “The Opposition has no good leader for the top job” and “I’ve lost faith in Labor across the board and their in-house fighting”.

Many ALP Supporters were dissatisfied with Mr Howard and the L-NP Government policies, with comments such as: “I want to see some changes to the refugee detention problems”, “Because the Liberal Governments is liberal with the truth”, “I disagree with the Liberals actions on detention and Centrelink changes”, “Lying cheating Prime Minister, you can’t believe a word they say” and “Growing disillusionment with Howard Government, time for a change. Howard is too far to the right”.

ALP supporters were typically satisfied with the Labor Party and its policies, saying: “The Labor Party considers family values”, “The Labor Party is less conservative. It is a worker’s Party. Grass root level”, “The ALP is far more in touch with the common people, the Liberals govern for business” and “Labor are socially aware. They give everyone a fair go”

On the question of who the electorate thinks will win the next Federal election, the L-NP is leading the ALP by 29.5%. Now 57.5% (unchanged since late March) of electors think the L-NP will win the Federal election while 28% (unchanged) think the ALP will win (14.5% can’t say).

This latest Morgan Poll on Federal Voting Intention was conducted face-to-face on the weekends of April 2/3 and 9/10, 2005, with an Australia-wide cross-section of 2,006 electors. Electors were asked: “If a Federal election for the House of Representatives were being held today - which party would receive your first preference?” Of all electors surveyed, 4.5% (unchanged) did not name a party.

 

 

For further information:

Gary Morgan

Office (03) 9224 5213

Mobile 0411 129 094

Home (03) 9419 3242

Michele Levine

Office (03) 9224 5215

Mobile 0411 129 093

Home (03) 9817 3066

THINK WILL WIN

Respondents were asked: "Regardless of who you'd like to win, who to you THINK will win the next Federal election - the Liberal-National Coalition ot the Labor Party?"

Think Will Win
           L-NP
           ALP
     Can't Say
  % % %
October 30/31 & November 6/7, 2004 56 28 16
November 13/14 & 20/21, 2004 55.5 30 14.5
November 27/28 & December 4/5, 2004 63.5 23 13.5
December 11/12 & 18/19, 2004 64 23.5 12.5
January 8/9 & 15/16, 2005 69.5 19.5 11
January 22/23 & 29/30, 2005 67 21.5 11.5
February 5/6 & 12/13, 2005 67 21.5 11.5
February 19/20 & 26/27, 2005 63.5 23.5 13
March 5/6, 2005 57 31 12
March 12/13, 2005 60 27.5 12.5
March 19/20 & 26/27, 2005 57.5 28 14.5
April 2/3 & 9/10, 2005 57.5 28 14.5

 

FEDERAL VOTING INTENTION SUMMARY - HOUSE OF REPS (%)

PRIMARY VOTE L-NP ALP Aust.
Dem. #
The
Greens

Family

First#

One
Nation #
Ind./
Others#
Election March 2, 1996 47.3 (8.6) 38.8 6.8 1.7 * N/A 5.4
Election October 3, 1998 1 39.5 (5.3) 40.1 5.1 2.1 * 8.5 4.7
Election November 10, 2001 43 (5.6) 37.8 5.4 4.4 * 4.3 5.1
Election October 9, 2004 46.4 (5.9) 37.6 1.2 7.2 2 1.2 4.4
MORGAN POLL
Oct 30/31 & Nov 6/7, 2004 44.5 (2.5) 39.5 2 8.5 2 1 2.5
Nov 13/14 & 20/21, 2004 44 (3) 39 2 8.5 1.5 1 4
Nov 27/28 & Dec 4/5, 2004 46.5 (2.5) 36 1.5 9 2.5 1 3.5
Dec 11/12 & 18/19, 2004 45.5 (3) 36.5 1.5 9.5 2 1.5 3.5
Jan 8/9 & 15/16, 2005 47 (3.5) 37 1.5 7.5 2 1 4
Jan 22/23 & 29/30, 2005 45 (2.5) 38 2 8 2 1.5 3.5
Feb 5/6 & 12/13, 2005 45 (2.5) 37.5 2 9 2 1 3.5
Feb 19/20 & 26/27, 2005 46 (2.5) 38.5 2 7.5 1 0.5 4.5
Mar 5/6, 2005 42 (2.5) 43 1.5 7 2.5 1 3
Mar 12/13, 2005 44.5 (2.5) 37 1 10 2.5 1 4
Mar 19/20 & 26/27, 2005 44 (2.5) 39 1.5 8 2 1 4.5
Apr 2/3 & 9/10, 2005 40.5 (1.5) 43 1.5 8 2 1.5 3.5

Note: National Party results are in brackets
# Sample Sizes under 50 should be treated with caution

*The Family First Party were included as an option on Federal Voting Intention from October 30, 2004

1 October 3, 1998 Federal election results have been updated to include results from the electorate of Newcastle supplementary election. The L-NP did not have a candidate contesting the electorate of Newcastle.

TWO-PARTY PREFERRED VOTE (%)

         
 

L-NP

ALP

   
         

Election March 2, 1996

53.6

46.4

   

Election October 3, 1998

49

51

   
Election November 10, 2001 51 49    
Election October 9, 2004 52.7 47.3    
         

MORGAN POLL

Preferences distributed

by how electors

say they will vote

Preferences distributed

by how electors voted

at the 2004 election

Oct 30/31 & Novr 6/7, 2004 50.5 49.5 50.5 49.5
Nov 13/14 & 20/21, 2004 50 50 50.5 49.5
Nov 27/28 & Dec 4/5, 2004 52.5 47.5 53 47
Dec 11/12 & 18/19, 2004 51 49 52.5 47.5
Jan 8/9 & 15/16, 2005 53.5 46.5 53 47
Jan 22/23 & 29/30, 2005 51.5 48.5 51.5 48.5
Feb 5/6 & 12/13, 2005 51.5 48.5 52 48
Feb 19/20 & 26/27, 2005 52 48 52 48
Mar 5/6, 2005 47.5 52.5 48 52
Mar 12/13, 2005 51.5 48.5 52 48
Mar 19/20 & 26/27, 2005 50.5 49.5 50.5 49.5
April 2/3 & 9/10, 2005 46 54 47 53

 

TWO-PARTY PREFERENCES OF MINOR PARTIES (%)

  Mar 5/6 Mar 12/13 Mar 19/20 & 26/27 Apr 2/3 & 9/10
MORGAN POLL
L-NP
ALP
L-NP
ALP
L-NP
ALP
L-NP
ALP
Australian Democrats # 43.5 56.5 25.5 74.5 44.5 55.5 52.5 47.5

The Greens

18 82 21 79 20 80 13.5 86.5
Family First#
70.5 29.5 55 45 49.5 50.5 49 51
One Nation #
15.5 84.5 75.5 24.5 40.5 59.5 49.5 50.5

Independent/Other

28 72 49.5 50.5 50.5 49.5 49.5 50.5

 

Morgan Poll sampling tolerance:

The margin of error to be allowed for in any estimate depends mainly on the number of interviews on which it is based. The following table gives indications of the likely range within which estimates would be 95% likely to fall, expressed as the number of percentage points above or below the actual estimate. The figures are approximate and for general guidance only, and assume a simple random sample. Allowance for design effects (such as stratification and weighting) should be made as appropriate.

Sample size

Percentage estimate

 

25-75%

10% or 90%

5% or 95%

1000

 ± 3

 ± 2

 ± 1½

# Sample Sizes under 50 should be treated with caution
Sample: 2,006 electors interviewed face-to-face on April 2/3 & 9/10, 2005

4.5% (unchanged) did not name a party.

View Federal Voting Intention Trend

 


Finding No. 3852 is taken from Computer Report No. 2030


© 2007 Roy Morgan Research. All Rights Reserved
privacy-statement   



    « Powered by Straker SHADO CMS »