Howard Overwhelms Beazley As Better PM Yet Approval Rating Less Than 50%
| Finding No. 4005 -
April 07, 2006 |
More than twice as many Australian voters think John Howard (61%) would make a better Prime Minister than Kim Beazley (26%) a special Roy Morgan telephone survey finds. Yet, only 49% of voters approved of the way Mr Howard is handling his job as Prime Minister, 44% of voters disapproved of the way My Howard was handling his job and 7% couldn’t say. This is the lowest approval rating and the highest disapproval rating for Mr Howard since August 2004 —before the last Federal election.
My Beazley’s approval rating of 29% is the lowest approval rating of an Opposition Leader since Simon Crean was Leader of the Opposition - 26% in May and June 2003 and only the second lowest of any Labor Opposition Leader. More than twice as many voters disapprove (62%) of Mr Beazley’s performance as Opposition Leader than approve of it (29%) while 9% couldn’t say.
Gary Morgan says:
“These approval ratings will not make pleasant reading for either John Howard or Kim Beazley. Mr Howard may well be the better Prime Minister for 61% of voters but with an approval rating of only 49% the lowest since before his 2004 Federal election win, this is a hollow victory.
Kim Beazley’s approval ratings are the lowest he has ever received and only Simon Crean has received worse as a Labor Opposition Leader.
A Morgan Poll released today looks at voters’ preferences to lead both main political parties —it makes very interesting reading!”
This special Roy Morgan telephone survey was conducted on the evenings of March 29/30, 2006 with an Australia-wide cross section of 898 men and women aged 14 and over. More details are available on a subscription basis.
- 1. - Better Prime Minister
Respondents were asked: “Thinking of Mr Howard and Mr Beazley. In your opinion, who would make the better Prime Minister — Mr Howard or Mr Beazley?”
Support for Mr Howard as better Prime Minister was highest amongst L-NP supporters (93%) followed by Australian Democrats (49%) voters and Independent and other candidates supporters (44%). Support for Mr Beazley was highest amongst ALP supporters (48%) followed by Greens (44%) and Australian Democrats (41%) supporters.
| |
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Federal Voting Intention |
| |
Jan |
Sep |
Mar |
|
|
Aust |
The |
Ind/ |
No |
| |
2005 |
2005 |
2006 |
L-NP |
ALP |
Dem.# |
Greens |
Other# |
Answer# |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Howard |
57 |
59 |
61 |
93 |
36 |
49 |
31 |
44 |
33 |
|
Beazley |
33 |
30 |
26 |
3 |
48 |
41 |
44 |
26 |
- |
|
Someone else |
6 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
4 |
5 |
- |
|
Can't say |
4 |
5 |
12 |
3 |
16 |
10 |
21 |
25 |
67 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
# Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution
Support for Mr Howard as better Prime Minister was marginally higher amongst women (61%) than men (60%) and highest of all with voters aged 50 and over. Support for Mr Beazley was the same amongst men and women (both 26%) and highest amongst those aged 35-49.
| |
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Sex and Age |
| |
Jan |
Sep |
Mar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2005 |
2005 |
2006 |
Men |
Women |
18-24 |
25-34 |
35-49 |
50+ |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Howard |
57 |
59 |
61 |
60 |
61 |
61 |
59 |
57 |
64 |
|
Beazley |
33 |
30 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
23 |
24 |
31 |
24 |
|
Someone else |
6 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
- |
1 |
|
Can't say |
4 |
5 |
12 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
12 |
11 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
# Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution
Long-term trend for Better Prime Minister, since 2001
| |
12/13 Sept, 2001 |
Sept 15/16, 2001 |
Sept, 2002^ |
April 23, 2003^ |
May 20-22, 2003^ |
June 4-5, 2003^ |
Sep 15-17 2003 |
Dec 03, 2003* |
June 2/3, 2004* |
June 30/July 1 2004* |
Aug4/8 2004* |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Howard |
53 |
64 |
57 |
71 |
71 |
73 |
57 |
61.5 |
50 |
55 |
58 |
|
Beazley |
31 |
23 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
16 |
25 |
25 |
38 |
34 |
34 |
|
Other/Can't Say |
16 |
13 |
18 |
14 |
10 |
11 |
18 |
13.5 |
12 |
11 |
8 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Aug 11/12 2004* |
Aug 18/19 2004* |
Sept 1/2 2004* |
Sept 15/16 2004* |
Sept 22/23 2004* |
Sept 29/30 2004* |
Oct 7/8 2004* |
Nov 3/4 2004* |
Jan 19/20 2005 |
Sept 21/22 2005 |
|
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
Howard |
50 |
49 |
51 |
49 |
53 |
57 |
54 |
62 |
57 |
59 |
|
|
Beazley |
40 |
40 |
38 |
42 |
36 |
34 |
37 |
29 |
33 |
30 |
|
|
Other/Can't Say |
10 |
11 |
11 |
9 |
11 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
^Simon Crean was Leader of the ALP from Nov 22, 2001 to Dec 2, 2003
*Mark Latham was Leader of the ALP from December 2003 until January 2005
2. - Approval of Leaders
Prime Minister
Respondents were asked: “Do you approve or disapprove of the way Mr Howard is handling his job as Prime Minister?”
Mr Howard’s approval ratings were highest amongst L-NP supporters (89%) followed by Independent and other candidates supporters (34%). Disapproval ratings were highest amongst Greens supporters (78%) and Labor supporters (73%)
| |
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Federal Voting Intention |
| |
Aug 11/12 |
Aug 18/19 |
Sep 1/2 |
Sep 15/16 |
Sep 22/23 |
Sep 29/30 |
Oct 7/8 |
Nov 3/4 |
Sep 21/22 |
Mar 29/30 |
|
|
Aust |
The |
Ind/ |
No |
| |
2004 |
2004 |
2005 |
2005 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
L-NP |
ALP |
Dem.# |
Greens |
Other# |
Answer# |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Approve |
47 |
47 |
50 |
51 |
54 |
56 |
53 |
59 |
54 |
49 |
89 |
20 |
23 |
14 |
34 |
34 |
|
Disapprove |
44 |
47 |
43 |
43 |
38 |
38 |
40 |
34 |
40 |
44 |
7 |
73 |
66 |
78 |
57 |
48 |
|
Can't say |
9 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
11 |
8 |
9 |
18 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
# Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution
Mr Howard’s approval ratings were higher amongst men (50%) than women (48%) and highest in those aged 50 and over (55%) followed by those aged 25-34. Disapproval ratings were highest amongst those aged 35-49 and those aged 18-24.
| |
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Sex and Age |
| |
Aug 11/12 |
Aug 18/19 |
Sep 1/2 |
Sep 15/16 |
Sep 22/23 |
Sep 29/30 |
Oct 7/8 |
Nov 3/4 |
Sep 21/22 |
Mar 29/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2004 |
2004 |
2005 |
2005 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Men |
Women |
18-24 |
25-34 |
35-49 |
50+ |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Approve |
47 |
47 |
50 |
51 |
54 |
56 |
53 |
59 |
54 |
49 |
50 |
48 |
44 |
48 |
42 |
55 |
|
Disapprove |
44 |
47 |
43 |
43 |
38 |
38 |
40 |
34 |
40 |
44 |
45 |
44 |
51 |
42 |
52 |
39 |
|
Can't say |
9 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
5 |
10 |
6 |
6 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
# Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution
Approval Rating Trend for Prime Minister since 1996 Federal election
| |
Mar 2/3
(Election Weekend) |
Mar 16-23 |
Mar 30 — Apr 6 |
Apr13-20 |
Apr 27- May 5 |
May 11-18 |
May 26 — June 2 |
Sep 15/16 |
Sep
16/17 |
Apr
11/12 |
May 17/18 |
June 2/3 |
| |
1996 |
1996 |
1996 |
1996 |
1996 |
1996 |
1996 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2003 |
2004 |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Approve |
46 |
49 |
54 |
54 |
57 |
67 |
67 |
60 |
52 |
65 |
65 |
48 |
|
Disapprove |
32 |
13 |
13 |
16 |
17 |
15 |
25 |
23 |
40 |
28 |
30 |
45 |
|
Can't say |
22 |
38 |
33 |
30 |
26 |
18 |
8 |
17 |
8 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
June 30/July 1 |
Aug 4/5 |
Aug
11/12 |
Aug
18/19 |
Sep
1/2 |
Sep
15/16 |
Sep
22/23 |
Sep
29/30 |
Oct
7/8 |
Nov
3/4 |
Sep
21/22 |
Mar
29/30 |
| |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Approve |
55 |
58 |
47 |
47 |
50 |
51 |
54 |
56 |
53 |
59 |
54 |
49 |
|
Disapprove |
38 |
34 |
44 |
47 |
43 |
43 |
38 |
38 |
40 |
34 |
40 |
44 |
|
Can't say |
7 |
8 |
9 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Opposition Leader
Respondents were asked: “Do you approve or disapprove of the way Mr Beazley is handling his job as Leader of the Opposition?”
Mr Beazley’s approval ratings were highest amongst Independent and other candidates supporters followed by ALP supporters and Australian Democrats supporters. Disapproval ratings were highest amongst Greens supporters (76%), L-NP supporters (64%) and Democrats supporters (62%).
| |
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Federal Voting Intention |
| |
Aug 11/12* |
Aug 18/19* |
Sep
1/2* |
Sep
15/16* |
Sep 22/23*` |
Sep 29/30* |
Oct 7/8* |
Nov 3/4* |
Sep 21/22 |
Mar
29/30 |
|
|
Aust |
The |
Ind/ |
No |
| |
2004 |
2004 |
2005 |
2005 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
L-NP |
ALP |
Dem.# |
Greens |
Other# |
Answer# |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Approve |
56 |
58 |
58 |
64 |
55 |
55 |
58 |
47 |
47 |
29 |
26 |
36 |
32 |
20 |
42 |
17 |
|
Disapprove |
30 |
32 |
30 |
26 |
33 |
34 |
30 |
43 |
42 |
62 |
64 |
57 |
62 |
76 |
50 |
41 |
|
Can't say |
14 |
10 |
12 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
12 |
10 |
11 |
9 |
10 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
8 |
42 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
# Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution
* Mark Latham was Leader of the ALP from December 2003 until January 2005
Mr Beazley’s approval ratings were higher amongst men (31%) than women (28%) and highest for those aged 25-34 (33%). Disapproval ratings were higher for those aged 50 and over (66%) followed by those aged 35-49 (64%).
| |
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Sex and Age |
| |
Aug 11/12* |
Aug 18/19* |
Sep
1/2* |
Sep
15/16* |
Sep 22/23*` |
Sep 29/30* |
Oct 7/8* |
Nov 3/4* |
Sep 21/22 |
Mar
29/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2004 |
2004 |
2005 |
2005 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Men |
Women |
18-24 |
25-34 |
35-49 |
50+ |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Approve |
56 |
58 |
58 |
64 |
55 |
55 |
58 |
47 |
47 |
29 |
31 |
28 |
26 |
33 |
30 |
28 |
|
Disapprove |
30 |
32 |
30 |
26 |
33 |
34 |
30 |
43 |
42 |
62 |
62 |
62 |
51 |
57 |
64 |
66 |
|
Can't say |
14 |
10 |
12 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
12 |
10 |
11 |
9 |
7 |
10 |
23 |
10 |
6 |
6 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
# Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution
* Mark Latham was Leader of the ALP from December 2003 until January 2005
Approval Rating Trend for Opposition Leader since 1996 Federal election
| |
Mar 16-23 |
Mar 30 — Apr 6 |
Apr13-20 |
Apr 27- May 5 |
May 11-18 |
May 26 — June 2 |
Sep 15/16 |
Sep 16/17^ |
Apr 11/12^ |
May 17/18^ |
June 2/3* |
June 30/July 1* |
| |
1996 |
1996 |
1996 |
1996 |
1996 |
1996 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2003 |
2004 |
2004 |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Approve |
34 |
41 |
42 |
45 |
52 |
48 |
35 |
30 |
26 |
26 |
56 |
50 |
|
Disapprove |
17 |
15 |
16 |
16 |
17 |
21 |
54 |
38 |
60 |
63 |
32 |
37 |
|
Can't say |
49 |
44 |
42 |
39 |
31 |
31 |
11 |
32 |
14 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
| |