Home |  site-map |  indonesia |  indonesian-single-source-articles |  asteroid-user-registration |

Roy Morgan OZ Panel Login  |  Mail Diary Panel Login |   careers |  contact-us |  state-of-the-nation-webcast |

Roy Morgan Research OnlineStore Video Link International Tandberg Starter Pack Promotion The Latest Roy Morgan Poll
 Search:   
 COMPANY  ONLINE STORE  PRODUCTS  SERVICES  INDUSTRIES  MORGAN POLL  PAPERS  PRESS RELEASES  CONSUMER CONFIDENCE  READERSHIP  UNEMPLOYMENT  THE REACTOR  CAREERS 
   NEWS : Morgan Poll :
Printer Friendly Version  Printer Friendly Version    E-mail It  E-mail It  
  
 
Since the Debate leaders now equal on Job Approval – Gillard (46%) cf. Abbott (46%)
The gender gap is closing for Tony Abbott


Finding No. 4544 - This special telephone Morgan Poll was conducted over the last two nights July 27/28, 2010, with an Australia-wide cross section of 680 electors.: July 29, 2010

Despite substantial gains in the electorate’s perception of the ALP as the best party for health services and hospitals, needs of families and a fair workplace and employment relations, Julia Gillard has lost ground personally — with her approval rating since the Debate down 12% to 46% — 37% (up 11%) now disapprove and 17% (up 1%) undecided.

Tony Abbott on the other hand has gained in overall approval — now 46% (up 11%) approve of the way he is handling his job — equal to Julia Gillard. Julia Gillard is still preferred as Prime Minister but with a substantially reduced lead — now 48% (down 10%) prefer Julia Gillard as Prime Minister compared to 33% (up 4%) who prefer Opposition Leader Tony Abbott.

The gender divide that has emerged as such a strong theme for this Federal Election is still strong for Julia Gillard. Prime Minister Gillard’s approval has dropped substantially among both men (down 12% to 40%) and women (down 8% to 51%) — and her position as ‘Better PM’ has been reduced among both men (down 9% to 45%) and women (down 10% to 52%).

However, Tony Abbott has gained ground with women — 41% (up 5%) now approve of Tony Abbott’s handing of his job while 51% (up 1%) of men approve.

Since before the Debate the ALP has made substantial ground in better party for both health services and hospitals (51%, up 6% say ALP, 26%, down 8% say L-NP); and needs of families (45%, up 10% say ALP, 31%, up 2% say L-NP) and a fair workplace and employment relations (59%, up 9% say ALP, 26%, down 5% say L-NP).

Both major parties have lost ground on the issues of the environment and reducing taxes. The Greens are clearly seen as the best party for looking after the environment (57%, up 10%) compared to the ALP (15%, down 2%) and L-NP 14% (down 6%).

The Greens are also seen as the best party for managing global warming and climate change (46%, up 5%) at the expense of both major parties — compared to the L-NP (19%, down 4%) and ALP 17% (down 4%).

The L-NP is still seen as better for reducing taxes ‘you and your family’ pay (39%, down 3%) vs. ALP 34% (down 1%).

The L-NP is clearly seen as better for managing immigration and population (43% vs. 33% ALP) and reducing the number of illegal boat people (50% vs. 20% ALP) and for improving business in Australia (54% vs. 29% ALP) and for keeping interest rates low (41% vs. 27% ALP).

On the issue of which party is better for day-to-day living costs, L-NP and ALP are both equal at 34%.

At this point in the campaign following the Debate, the electorate is focused more on the qualities and personalities of the leaders and less on their party’s relative strength in various policy areas.

The special Roy Morgan Qualitative Research finds that electors have not yet accepted the way Julia Gillard came to power. However those electors who support Julia Gillard see her as ‘intelligent; articulate and a good clear speaker, a leader and a good representative, some are simply pleased that a woman is in the job, that women will be counted, and that more modern policies will apply to them better.

For Tony Abbott the negatives remain focused on his religious beliefs, extreme conservatism, narrow mindedness, however electors who approve of Abbott see him as a family man, with family values, and Christian morals, honest and straightforward, without hidden agendas.

This may be at least partly because the campaign has not yet focused on issues that really matter to electors — the economy, taxes, health and social welfare.

So for most people the campaign has provided an opportunity to see how the two leaders performed on issues that are of little importance to electors personally.

The continued disunity in the ALP created by Kevin Rudd supporters threatens to prolong the focus on personal issues rather than real policy differences.

This special telephone Morgan Poll was conducted over the last two nights July 27/28, 2010, with an Australia-wide cross section of 680 electors.

 

Since Julia Gillard became Prime Minister (June 24, 2010)

 

Better Prime Minister: Gillard v Abbott

Respondents were asked: “Thinking of Ms. Gillard and Mr. Abbott. In your opinion, who would make the better Prime Minister — Ms. Gillard or Mr. Abbott?”

 

Electors 18+

Men

Women

 

Jun 25-28,

2010

Jul 20/21,

2010

Jul 27/28,

2010

Jun 25-28,

2010

Jul 20/21,

2010

Jul 27/28,

2010

Jun 25-28,

2010

Jul 20/21,

2010

Jul 27/28,

2010

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Gillard

49

58

48

43

54

45

54

62

52

Abbott

34

29

33

40

36

39

28

22

29

Gillard lead

15

29

15

17

18

6

26

40

23

Other / Neither

17

13

19

17

10

16

18

16

19

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

Approval of Leaders — Julia Gillard v Tony Abbott

Prime Minister: Julia Gillard

Respondents were asked: “Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way Ms. Gillard is handling her job as Prime Minister?”

Analysis by Sex (Approve/ Disapprove — Julia Gillard)

 

Electors 18+

Men

Women

 

Jun 25-28,

2010

Jul 20/21,

2010

Jul 27/28,

2010

Jun 25-28,

2010

Jul 20/21,

2010

Jul 27/28,

2010

Jun 25-28,

2010

Jul 20/21,

2010

Jul 27/28,

2010

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Approve

40

58

46

37

52

40

44

63

51

Disapprove

24

26

37

26

30

40

22

22

34

Approve — Disapprove

16

32

9

11

22

0

22

41

17

Can’t say

36

16

17

37

18

20

34

15

15

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

Opposition Leader: Tony Abbott

Respondents were asked: “Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way Mr. Abbott is handling his job as Leader of the Opposition?”

Analysis by Sex (Approve/ Disapprove — Tony Abbott)

 

Electors 18+

Men

Women

 

Jun 25-28,

2010

Jul 20/21,

2010

Jul 27/28,

2010

Jun 25-28,

2010

Jul 20/21,

2010

Jul 27/28,

2010

Jun 25-28,

2010

Jul 20/21,

2010

Jul 27/28,

2010

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Approve

48

42

46

53

50

51

44

36

41

Disapprove

41

48

40

38

43

37

44

52

43

Approve — Disapprove

7

(6)

6

15

7

14

0

(16)

(2)

Can’t say

11

10

14

9

7

12

12

12

16

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

Better Prime Minister: Gillard v Abbott

Respondents were asked: “Thinking of Ms. Gillard and Mr. Abbott. In your opinion, who would make the better Prime Minister — Ms. Gillard or Mr. Abbott?”

 

Rudd v Turnbull

Rudd v Abbott

Gillard v Abbott

 

May 20/21,

2009

July 1/2,

2009

Oct 7/8,

2009

Dec 2/3,

2009

May 4/5,

2010

May 12/13,

2010

June 25-28,

2010

July 20/21,

2010

July 27/28,

2010

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Gillard

60.5

70

69

60

53

49

49

58

48

Abbott

26.5

20

18

25

32

37

34

29

33

Gillard lead

34

50

51

35

21

12

15

29

15

Other / Can’t say

13

10

13

15

15

14

17

13

19

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

 

Electors 18+

Analysis by Federal Voting Intention

 

July 27/28,

2010

ALP

Lib

Nat#

The Greens

Family First#

Ind/ Other#

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Gillard

48

87

10

12

76

26

40

Abbott

33

4

77

65

3

34

17

Gillard lead

15

83

(67)

(53)

73

(8)

23

Other / Neither

19

9

13

23

21

40

43

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

# Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution.

 

 

Electors 18+

Analysis by Sex and Age

 

July 27/28,

2010

Men

Women

18-24

25-34

35-49

50+

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Gillard

48

45

52

58

50

50

44

Abbott

33

39

29

26

26

30

41

Gillard lead

15

6

23

32

24

20

3

Other / Neither

19

16

19

16

24

20

15

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Approval of Leaders — Julia Gillard v Tony Abbott

Prime Minister: Julia Gillard

Respondents were asked: “Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way Ms. Gillard is handling her job as Prime Minister?”

 

Prime Minister Rudd

Prime Minister Gillard

 

Oct 7/8,

2009

Dec 2/3,

2009

Jan 13/14,

2010

May 4/5,

2010

May 12/13,

2010

June 25-28,

2010

July 20/21,

2010

July 27/28,

2010

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Approve

66

53

50

42

36

40

58

46

Disapprove

24

36

35

49

55

24

26

37

Approve - Disapprove

42

17

15

(7)

(19)

16

32

9

Can’t say

10

11

15

9

9

36

16

17

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

 

Electors 18+

Analysis by Federal Voting Intention

 

July 27/28,

2010

ALP

Lib

Nat#

The

Greens

Family

First#

Ind/

Other#

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Approve

46

78

20

12

44

15

37

Disapprove

37

12

67

66

28

49

33

Approve - Disapprove

9

66

(47)

(54)

16

(34)

4

Can’t say

17

10

13

22

28

36

30

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

# Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution.

 

 

Electors 18+

Analysis by Sex & Age

 

July 27/28,

2010

Men

Women

18-24

25-34

35-49

50+

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Approve

46

40

51

51

46

45

45

Disapprove

37

40

34

32

27

35

43

Approve - Disapprove

9

0

17

19

19

10

2

Can’t say

17

20

15

17

27

20

12

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100


Opposition Leader: Tony Abbott

Respondents were asked: “Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way Mr. Abbott is handling his job as Leader of the Opposition?”

 

MT*

Tony Abbott as Opposition Leader

 

Oct. 7/8,

2009*

Dec 2/3,

2009

Jan 13/14,

2010

May 4/5,

2010

May 12/13,

2010

June 25-28,

2010

July 20/21,

2010

July 27/28,

2010

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Approve

29

34

41

40.5

44

48

42

46

Disapprove

56

27

32

41.5

46

41

48

40

Approve - Disapprove

(27)

7

9

(1)

(2)

7

(6)

6

Can’t say

15

39

27

18

10

11

10

14

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

*Malcolm Turnbull was Opposition Leader prior to December 2009 before being replaced by Tony Abbott.

 

 

Electors 18+

Analysis by Federal Voting Intention

 

July 27/28,

2010

ALP

Lib

Nat#

The

Greens

Family

First#

Ind/

Other#

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Approve

46

29

76

72

21

27

36

Disapprove

40

62

12

18

71

26

50

Approve - Disapprove

6

(33)

64

54

(50)

1

(14)

Can’t say

14

9

12

10

8

47

14

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

# Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution.

 

 

Electors 18+

Analysis by Sex & Age

 

July 27/28,

2010

Men

Women

18-24

25-34

35-49

50+

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Approve

46

51

41

36

39

48

51

Disapprove

40

37

43

49

36

41

38

Approve - Disapprove

6

14

(2)

(12)

2

7

13

Can’t say

14

12

16

15

25

11

11

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — IMPROVING HEALTH SERVICES & HOSPITALS

 

Jul

09

Aug

09

Sep

09

Oct

09

Nov

09

Dec

09

Jan

10

Feb

10

Mar

10

Apr

10

May

10

Jun

10

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

ALP

46

47

48

46

45

45

40

45

44

42

48

45

51

L-NP

33

30

29

29

31

31

37

31

33

31

29

34

26

Greens

4

3

5

4

5

4

5

4

3

5

4

4

3

Other/Can't Say

20

22

23

25

21

24

22

25

23

25

22

21

20

Enrolled voters

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Electors were allowed to nominate more than 1 party for each issue.

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — LOOKING AFTER THE ENVIRONMENT

 

Jul

09

Aug

09

Sep

09

Oct

09

Nov

09

Dec

09

Jan

10

Feb

10

Mar

10

Apr

10

May

10

Jun

10

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

ALP

22

22

21

24

22

22

19

21

22

19

20

17

15

L-NP

17

16

16

15

19

17

19

18

18

17

17

20

14

Greens

48

47

48

46

47

46

46

46

47

47

48

47

57

Other/Can't Say

17

18

19

20

16

19

20

21

18

20

20

19

14

Enrolled voters

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Electors were allowed to nominate more than 1 party for each issue.

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — IMPROVING BUSINESS IN AUSTRALIA

 

Jul

09

Aug

09

Sep

09

Oct

09

Nov

09

Dec

09

Jan

10

Feb

10

Mar

10

Apr

10

May

10

Jun

10

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

ALP

33

33

34

35

34

34

30

31

31

28

31

27

29

L-NP

51

50

47

47

48

49

50

51

51

50

49

54

54

Greens

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

2

2

3

2

1

2

Other/Can't Say

18

18

21

19

18

19

20

21

19

22

21

19

15

Enrolled voters

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Electors were allowed to nominate more than 1 party for each issue.

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — REDUCING THE TAXES YOU & YOUR FAMILY PAY

 

Jul

09

Aug

09

Sep

09

Oct

09

Nov

09

Dec

09

Jan

10

Feb

10

Mar

10

Apr

10

May

10

Jun

10

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

ALP

42

41

41

40

41

38

35

38

37

36

39

35

34

L-NP

36

36

34

37

37

38

40

36

39

37

37

42

39

Greens

2

3

2

2

2

2

2

3

2

4

3

2

2

Other/Can't Say

22

22

26

24

21

24

25

25

24

26

24

23

25

Enrolled voters

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Electors were allowed to nominate more than 1 party for each issue.

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — THE NEEDS OF FAMILIES

 

Jul

09

Aug

09

Sep

09

Oct

09

Nov

09

Dec

09

Jan

10

Feb

10

Mar

10

Apr

10

May

10

Jun

10

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

ALP

40

39

41

42

39

38

37

38

38

34

38

35

45

L-NP

24

21

22

20

24

22

25

25

25

23

22

29

31

Greens

4

3

5

4

5

4

4

4

3

5

5

5

4

Other/Can't Say

34

38

36

37

34

38

37

38

36

40

38

33

20

Enrolled voters

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Electors were allowed to nominate more than 1 party for each issue.

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — GLOBAL WARMING & CLIMATE CHANGE

 

Jul

09

Aug

09

Sep

09

Oct

09

Nov

09

Dec

09

Jan

10

Feb

10

Mar

10

Apr

10

May

10

Jun

10

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

ALP

26

26

27

29

27

32

25

25

26

23

25

21

17

L-NP

20

18

19

18

22

19

21

22

21

20

19

23

19

Greens

41

42

41

39

40

37

40

39

40

40

41

41

46

Other/Can't Say

17

18

19

19

16

18

19

21

19

22

21

18

18

Enrolled voters

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Electors were allowed to nominate more than 1 party for each issue.

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — FAIR WORKPLACE & EMPLOYMENT REGULATIONS

 

Jul

09

Aug

09

Sep

09

Oct

09

Nov

09

Dec

09

Jan

10

Feb

10

Mar

10

Apr

10

May

10

Jun

10

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

ALP

53

53

58

54

55

53

51

50

52

50

52

50

59

L-NP

29

28

23

25

26

28

29

29

28

27

26

31

26

Greens

4

3

3

4

3

3

5

3

4

6

4

3

4

Other/Can't Say

17

18

18

21

18

18

18

21

20

20

20

18

11

Enrolled voters

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Electors were allowed to nominate more than 1 party for each issue.

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — REDUCING THE NUMBER OF ILLEGAL BOAT PEOPLE COMING TO AUSTRALIA

 

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

ALP

20

L-NP

50

Greens

3

Other/Can't Say

27

Enrolled voters

100

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — MANAGING IMMIGRATION & POPULATION GROWTH

 

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

ALP

32

L-NP

43

Greens

7

Other/Can't Say

18

Enrolled voters

100

 

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — KEEPING INTEREST RATES DOWN

 

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

ALP

27

L-NP

41

Greens

2

Other/Can't Say

30

Enrolled voters

100

 

Which party ‘Better For’ — DAY TO DAY LIVING COSTS SUCH AS FOOD, FARES, PETROL, GAS, ELECTRICITY

 

 

July 27/28,

10

 

(%)

ALP

34

L-NP

34

Greens

5

Other/Can't Say

27

Enrolled voters

100

 

 

For further information:

 

Gary Morgan:      Office +61 3 9224 5213   Mobile +61 411 129 094

Michele Levine:    Office +61 3 9224 5215   Mobile +61 411 129 093

Margin of Error

The margin of error to be allowed for in any estimate depends mainly on the number of interviews on which it is based. The following table gives indications of the likely range within which estimates would be 95% likely to fall, expressed as the number of percentage points above or below the actual estimate. The figures are approximate and for general guidance only, and assume a simple random sample.

Sample Size

Percentage Estimate

 

40%-60%

25% or 75%

10% or 90%

5% or 95%

500

±4.5

±3.9

±2.7

±1.9

1,000

±3.2

±2.7

±1.9

±1.4

 

 

The Morgan Poll is conducted by the ONLY Australian and New Zealand member of the Gallup International Association.

 

No other public opinion poll taken in Australia has this qualification.


© 2010 Roy Morgan Research. All Rights Reserved
privacy-statement   



    « Powered by Straker SHADO CMS »