Gillard & Rudd both preferred as Prime Minister ahead of Abbott But Abbott preferred in NSW and clearly preferred in Queensland
| Finding No. 4550 -
This special telephone Morgan Poll was conducted on the night of August 3, 2010, with an Australia-wide cross section of 618 electors.:
August 05, 2010 |
Although Prime Minister Julia Gillard and former PM Kevin Rudd are preferred Prime Minister ahead of Opposition Leader Tony Abbott nationwide, in the key States of Queensland and New South Wales Tony Abbott is preferred as Prime Minister over both ALP candidates according to a special telephone Morgan Poll conducted on the night of August 3, 2010.
Nationwide Gillard (49%) is preferred to Abbott (40%) as Prime Minister while Rudd (47%) is narrowly preferred to Abbott (44%).
However, close analysis by States reveals the real story — in the key State of NSW Abbott (46%) is narrowly preferred to Gillard (45%) and Abbott (48%) is also narrowly preferred to Rudd (45%). Further north in Queensland, Abbott has strong leads over both candidates: Abbott (49%) cf. Gillard (36%) and Abbott (53%) cf. Rudd (39%).
In the State most heavily impacted by the Gillard Government’s proposed MRRT (Mining Resources Rent Tax), Western Australia, Gillard (47%) has a strong lead over Abbott (34%), while former Prime Minister Rudd (44%) has only a narrow lead over Abbott (41%).
In the southern States of Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania, Gillard holds very strong leads over Abbott. Victoria: Gillard (59%) cf. Abbott (31%); South Australia: Gillard (59%) cf. Abbott (34%) and Tasmania: Gillard (57%) cf. Abbott (28%).
Rudd is also preferred to Abbott in all three States. Victoria: Rudd (54%) cf. Abbott (33%); South Australia: Rudd (46%) cf. Abbott (44%) and Tasmania: Rudd (57%) cf. Abbott (34%).
Prime Minister Gillard (51%) performs strongly when electors are asked who they would prefer as Prime Minister compared to former Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull (34%). Gillard leads strongly in New South Wales (53% cf. 29%); Victoria (55% cf. 34%); South Australia (67% cf. 18%) and Tasmania (73% cf. 13%). Gillard also has a narrow lead in Western Australia (42% cf. 40%). However, in Queensland Turnbull (48%) has a strong lead over Gillard (34%).
Gary Morgan says:
“Today’s special telephone Morgan Poll reveals a worrying trend for Prime Minister Julia Gillard and the ALP Government. In the key States of New South Wales and Queensland in which the Federal Election will be won and lost, Abbott leads both Gillard and former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.
“Despite much talk about Rudd’s popularity in his home State that belief is not reflected when electors are actually asked who they prefer. In Queensland Abbott (53%) is clearly preferred as Prime Minister to Rudd (39%) — a lead of 14%. Abbott (49%) is also clearly preferred over Gillard (36%).
“The news in recent days that Rudd is keen to help campaign for the Gillard Government is an election ‘sleeper.’ Although both trail Abbott individually in Queensland and New South Wales will the images of Rudd & Gillard campaigning together help to bury the perception in much of the community that Gillard ‘knifed’ Rudd in the back to become Prime Minister and will these displays of unity make the Gillard Government more competitive in Queensland and New South Wales?
“A snap SMS Morgan Poll conducted early this evening asking whether a combined ‘Gillard/Rudd’ team can beat Tony Abbott finds 63% say yes compared to only 37% that say no.”
This special telephone Morgan Poll was conducted on the night of August 3, 2010, with an Australia-wide cross section of 618 electors.
For further information:
Gary Morgan: Office +61 3 9224 5213 Mobile +61 411 129 094
Michele Levine: Office +61 3 9224 5215 Mobile +61 411 129 093
Preferred Prime Minister: Julia Gillard vs. Tony Abbott
Electors were asked: “Julia Gillard or Tony Abbott — who would you prefer to see as Australia’s Prime Minister.”
|
|
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Federal Voting Intention |
|
|
Aug 3,
2010 |
ALP |
Lib |
Nat# |
The Greens |
Family First# |
Ind/ Other# |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Gillard |
49 |
92 |
9 |
19 |
78 |
34 |
43 |
|
Abbott |
40 |
2 |
85 |
68 |
6 |
66 |
39 |
|
Gillard lead |
9 |
90 |
(76) |
(49) |
72 |
(32) |
4 |
|
Other / Neither |
11 |
6 |
6 |
13 |
16 |
- |
18 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 | # Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution.
|
|
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by State |
|
|
Aug 3,
2010 |
NSW |
VIC |
QLD |
WA |
SA |
TAS# |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Gillard |
49 |
45 |
59 |
36 |
47 |
59 |
57 |
|
Abbott |
40 |
46 |
31 |
49 |
34 |
34 |
28 |
|
Gillard lead |
9 |
(1) |
28 |
(13) |
13 |
25 |
29 |
|
Other / Neither |
11 |
9 |
10 |
15 |
19 |
7 |
15 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 | # Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution.
|
|
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Sex & Age |
|
|
Aug 3,
2010 |
Men |
Women |
18-24 |
25-34 |
35-49 |
50+ |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Gillard |
49 |
49 |
48 |
59 |
60 |
45 |
45 |
|
Abbott |
40 |
43 |
38 |
32 |
27 |
42 |
45 |
|
Gillard lead |
9 |
6 |
10 |
27 |
33 |
3 |
- |
|
Other / Neither |
11 |
8 |
14 |
9 |
13 |
13 |
10 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Preferred Prime Minister: Tony Abbott vs. Kevin Rudd
Electors were asked: “Tony Abbott or Kevin Rudd — who would you prefer to see as Australia’s Prime Minister.”
|
|
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Federal Voting Intention |
|
|
Aug 3,
2010 |
ALP |
Lib |
Nat# |
The Greens |
Family First# |
Ind/ Other# |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Rudd |
47 |
83 |
11 |
13 |
78 |
34 |
47 |
|
Abbott |
44 |
7 |
84 |
79 |
15 |
66 |
41 |
|
Rudd lead |
3 |
76 |
(73) |
(66) |
63 |
(32) |
6 |
|
Other / Neither |
9 |
10 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
- |
12 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 | # Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution.
|
|
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by State |
|
|
Aug 3,
2010 |
NSW |
VIC |
QLD |
WA |
SA |
TAS# |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Rudd |
47 |
45 |
54 |
39 |
44 |
46 |
57 |
|
Abbott |
44 |
48 |
33 |
53 |
41 |
44 |
34 |
|
Rudd lead |
3 |
(3) |
21 |
(14) |
3 |
2 |
23 |
|
Other / Neither |
9 |
7 |
13 |
8 |
15 |
10 |
9 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 | # Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution.
|
|
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Sex & Age |
|
|
Aug 3,
2010 |
Men |
Women |
18-24 |
25-34 |
35-49 |
50+ |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Rudd |
47 |
49 |
45 |
58 |
50 |
47 |
43 |
|
Abbott |
44 |
43 |
44 |
34 |
34 |
44 |
49 |
|
Rudd lead |
3 |
6 |
1 |
24 |
16 |
3 |
(6) |
|
Other / Neither |
9 |
8 |
11 |
8 |
16 |
9 |
8 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Preferred Prime Minister: Julia Gillard vs. Malcolm Turnbull
Electors were asked: “Julia Gillard or Malcolm Turnbull — who would you prefer to see as Australia’s Prime Minister.”
|
|
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Federal Voting Intention |
|
|
Aug 3,
2010 |
ALP |
Lib |
Nat# |
The Greens |
Family First# |
Ind/ Other# |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Gillard |
51 |
82 |
21 |
27 |
71 |
80 |
53 |
|
Turnbull |
34 |
8 |
63 |
70 |
18 |
20 |
28 |
|
Gillard lead |
17 |
74 |
(42) |
(43) |
53 |
60 |
25 |
|
Other / Neither |
15 |
10 |
16 |
3 |
11 |
- |
19 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 | # Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution.
|
|
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by State |
|
|
Aug 3,
2010 |
NSW |
VIC |
QLD |
WA |
SA |
TAS# |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Gillard |
51 |
53 |
55 |
34 |
42 |
67 |
73 |
|
Turnbull |
34 |
29 |
34 |
48 |
40 |
18 |
13 |
|
Gillard lead |
17 |
24 |
21 |
(14) |
2 |
49 |
60 |
|
Other / Neither |
15 |
18 |
11 |
18 |
18 |
15 |
14 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 | # Sample sizes less than 50 should be treated with caution.
|
|
Electors 18+ |
Analysis by Sex & Age |
|
|
Aug 3,
2010 |
Men |
Women |
18-24 |
25-34 |
35-49 |
50+ |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Gillard |
51 |
50 |
51 |
60 |
62 |
52 |
44 |
|
Turnbull |
34 |
38 |
31 |
30 |
25 |
30 |
41 |
|
Gillard lead |
17 |
12 |
20 |
30 |
37 |
22 |
3 |
|
Other / Neither |
15 |
12 |
18 |
10 |
13 |
18 |
15 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Margin of Error
The margin of error to be allowed for in any estimate depends mainly on the number of interviews on which it is based. The following table gives indications of the likely range within which estimates would be 95% likely to fall, expressed as the number of percentage points above or below the actual estimate. The figures are approximate and for general guidance only, and assume a simple random sample.
|
Sample Size |
Percentage Estimate |
|
|
40%-60% |
25% or 75% |
10% or 90% |
5% or 95% |
|
500 |
±4.5 |
±3.9 |
±2.7 |
±1.9 |
|
1,000 |
±3.2 |
±2.7 |
±1.9 |
±1.4 |
The Morgan Poll is conducted by the ONLY Australian and New Zealand member of the Gallup International Association.
No other public opinion poll taken in Australia has this qualification.
|